LoooSeR Posted April 9, 2020 Report Share Posted April 9, 2020 ZTQ-15 from above Spoiler Laviduce, Ramlaen, Stimpy75 and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoooSeR Posted April 21, 2020 Report Share Posted April 21, 2020 Quote Type 92 with CS/AA5 combat module with new 40 mm automatic cannon Quote In the announcement of the May issue of the magazine "Modern Armament", popular in the PRC, a photograph of a Type 92 armored personnel carrier, manufactured by Norinco Corporation with a CS/AA5 combat module with a new 40-mm automatic gun using telescopic ammunition, was published. NORINCO’s latest 40mm cannon has an adjustable rate of fire in the range of 100 to 200 rounds / min. NORINCO introduced two types of 40-mm telescopic shots: high-explosive fragmentation CS / BTE3 (initial velocity 1000 m / s) and armor-piercing subcaliber CS / BAA3 (initial velocity 1450 m / s). For the latter, armor piercing of 130 mm of vertical homogeneous steel armor from a distance of 1000 m is declared. Lord_James 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiedzmin Posted April 27, 2020 Report Share Posted April 27, 2020 some HE tests on Type99 prototype ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoooSeR Posted April 28, 2020 Report Share Posted April 28, 2020 ZTD-05 Zyklon, Ramlaen and Clan_Ghost_Bear 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoooSeR Posted May 5, 2020 Report Share Posted May 5, 2020 Heh, VT-4 turrets during production. Spoiler alanch90 and Laviduce 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiedzmin Posted May 8, 2020 Report Share Posted May 8, 2020 zbd04a Laviduce 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoooSeR Posted May 10, 2020 Report Share Posted May 10, 2020 Type 15 in mountains Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiedzmin Posted May 11, 2020 Report Share Posted May 11, 2020 https://badl.army.mil.bd/files/frontend/ebook/document/Ebook_file_170308092408.pdf https://badl.army.mil.bd/files/frontend/ebook/document/Ebook_file_170308091024.pdf https://badl.army.mil.bd/files/frontend/ebook/document/Ebook_file_170312094429.pdf Type 69-IIG Manuals 1000 rounds of APFSDS for barrel life look very suspiciously, especially considering that HEAT is same 1000 Laviduce and heretic88 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heretic88 Posted May 12, 2020 Report Share Posted May 12, 2020 16 hours ago, Wiedzmin said: Type 69-IIG Manuals This would be immensely useful for Mastermilo (the dutch guy who restores a Type-69 tank)... (if someone is interested in this particular type of tank, his channel is massively useful. He took it apart almost to the last bolt. Hull restoration is nearly complete. https://www.youtube.com/user/mastermilo82/videos) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiedzmin Posted May 12, 2020 Report Share Posted May 12, 2020 13 minutes ago, heretic88 said: This would be immensely useful for Mastermilo (the dutch guy who restores a Type-69 tank)... (if someone is interested in this particular type of tank, his channel is massively useful. He took it apart almost to the last bolt. Hull restoration is nearly complete. https://www.youtube.com/user/mastermilo82/videos) i think to many difference with his 69 for example here is usual T-54/55 shock absorber(0:49), the one in manual and on Type 96 is friction type(i do not understand the whole point of the replacement) absorber which chinese get from germans as far as i understand , engine could have some differences etc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiedzmin Posted May 12, 2020 Report Share Posted May 12, 2020 8x8 105mm gun 120mm PTZ89 ZPL94-1 105mm gun is there any chinese 105-120 gun based NOT on D10T design and parts ? Lord_James and Stimpy75 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TWMSR Posted May 12, 2020 Report Share Posted May 12, 2020 Copying is the highest form of flattery! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiedzmin Posted May 12, 2020 Report Share Posted May 12, 2020 15 minutes ago, TWMSR said: Copying is the highest form of flattery! just curious how far could D10 go/be redesigned to modern standards and it's not copying, documentation on D10 was transferred with T-54 i think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoooSeR Posted May 19, 2020 Report Share Posted May 19, 2020 That one ugly mf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beer Posted June 11, 2020 Report Share Posted June 11, 2020 Type-15 somewhere in the streets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HAKI2019 Posted June 18, 2020 Report Share Posted June 18, 2020 More ERAs Beer, Laviduce, SH_MM and 2 others 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alanch90 Posted June 18, 2020 Report Share Posted June 18, 2020 An article on the "Chinese Armata" has surfaced. Most important design characteristics: unmanned turret and 2 man crew. Judging by the drawings, it may suggest less emphasis on armor compared to T-14, even on the front of the crew compartment. The shape of the crew compartment is very reminiscing of the front hull of the Abrams, but in this case the UFP actually has a composite layer. As for the turret it looks very much like a clusterf*ck in my opinion, lots of sights and very uncommon placement for other turret equipment. The main gun seems like a 125 or even a 105mm, if its supposed to to be a traditional one or something border sci-fi like electrothermal-chemical is still unknown. I still don't know what to think about this thing, i'm still digesting it. But judging from the overall characteristics it suggest a tank lighter than T-14, perhaps in the 40 ton class, which makes sense so that its less restricted in terms of operation depending on the terrain, unlike heavier tanks such as Type 99A.https://club.6parkbbs.com/military/index.php?app=forum&act=threadview&tid=15471684 Scolopax and David Moyes 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoooSeR Posted June 19, 2020 Report Share Posted June 19, 2020 ZTQ-15 in natural habitat Scolopax and Laviduce 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HAKI2019 Posted June 21, 2020 Report Share Posted June 21, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoooSeR Posted July 3, 2020 Report Share Posted July 3, 2020 ZTQ-15 ERA looks like is FY4E Spoiler Unrelated Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoooSeR Posted July 12, 2020 Report Share Posted July 12, 2020 Scolopax and Stimpy75 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr.T Posted July 13, 2020 Report Share Posted July 13, 2020 On 6/18/2020 at 4:30 AM, alanch90 said: An article on the "Chinese Armata" has surfaced. Most important design characteristics: unmanned turret and 2 man crew. Judging by the drawings, it may suggest less emphasis on armor compared to T-14, even on the front of the crew compartment. The shape of the crew compartment is very reminiscing of the front hull of the Abrams, but in this case the UFP actually has a composite layer. As for the turret it looks very much like a clusterf*ck in my opinion, lots of sights and very uncommon placement for other turret equipment. The main gun seems like a 125 or even a 105mm, if its supposed to to be a traditional one or something border sci-fi like electrothermal-chemical is still unknown. I still don't know what to think about this thing, i'm still digesting it. But judging from the overall characteristics it suggest a tank lighter than T-14, perhaps in the 40 ton class, which makes sense so that its less restricted in terms of operation depending on the terrain, unlike heavier tanks such as Type 99A.https://club.6parkbbs.com/military/index.php?app=forum&act=threadview&tid=15471684 When you are limited by power pack like the Russians best stick to sub 50 ton tank that can use the existing drivetrains , and time will come when 2 man crew is just as effective as 3 man crew Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alanch90 Posted July 13, 2020 Report Share Posted July 13, 2020 29 minutes ago, mr.T said: When you are limited by power pack like the Russians best stick to sub 50 ton tank that can use the existing drivetrains , and time will come when 2 man crew is just as effective as 3 man crew the chinese have been building 1500hp engines for many years now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beer Posted July 14, 2020 Report Share Posted July 14, 2020 Airborne cargo carrier Scolopax 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoooSeR Posted July 24, 2020 Report Share Posted July 24, 2020 76th army Type 99s somewhere in Tibet. Spoiler Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpeg.500ead743c175df1c0a99372a32d0fef.jpeg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.