Jump to content
Sturgeon's House
LoooSeR

Syrian conflict.

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, roguetechie said:

 

 

I'm just going to leave it at thank you very much for so clearly and thoroughly demonstrating how spot on my issues with you are...

 

This is precisely the arrogance and etc I was referring to which is an all too common ingredient in your posts.

 

And for the record, I'm an American BITCH I can say whatever the fuck I please to you without needing an excuse or approval!

 

Feel free to fuck yourself with a chainsaw if you have a problem with this.

 

You don't get to dictate shit to me, and the sooner you realize that the sooner we'll get along.i give zero fucks about you or your voting habits etc.... 

 

Don't want me to call you out?

 

Simple, don't be a smarmy smug arrogant little fuck and I won't.

And what did I ever do to deserve such hostility?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Bronezhilet said:

You're an Israeli with an opinion. Of course that's haram.

 

That is far from the case and fuck you very much too... 

 

If you can get that from what I said, that says EVERYTHING about YOU.

 

I have a problem with the person not the ethnicity religion or etc, which I have made quite clear.

 

I hate assholes not JEWS ... 

 

I guess I have to be that fucking specific so I will be.

 

I'd think it would be clear by how I can be very strident about certain political stuff with other posters, but if they post something about the Gerlach periscope I will happily discuss that with them and upvote posts of theirs that I like on other parts of the forum.

 

It's my opinion which I reserve the right to have, and to change at any time should circumstances change. But I sure fucking won't let someone weasel out of having me say what I think because of some notional whatever that makes them somehow above reproach.

 

And I also won't sit still and let people back handedly imply that I'm calling someone out because of some concealed racism rather than because I think they're being a smarmy asshole.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Iraqi PM claims that the border with Syria is secure:

999239051545890817

 

I'm not sure what he means by this.  Much of the Iraqi border areas of Syria are still held by rebels.

 

Latest rumor is that the Tiger Forces are being re-deployed from Homs to the fight in the south along the Israeli/Jordanian border.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sat photo of T4 AB hangar after airstrike, several hangars at T4 were used by Irainians (Shahed-129 UAVs were spotted on sat photos there before Israeli airstrikes).

1110834_1000.jpg

 

Photos from inside for comparison:

Spoiler

1592457_1000.jpg

 

1592584_1000.jpg

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Results of Rastan operation

 

Cool footage of how mine clearing system is used in urban combat by SAA. Probably another Golan system, based on infantry UR-82P and Ural truck. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Idlib - MoD map showing of observation posts of Turkey (12) on one side, Russia (10) and Iran (7) on the other, that overview ceasefire between Idlibostan militants and Syrians. 

1721785_original.jpg

Red - Russian, Yellow - Turkey.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Israeli strike on Dabaa AB in Southern Syria, Quseir.

Quote

- The plane fired 2 missiles;
- Parts of the 72nd Air Defense Brigade reacted and shot down 1 missile, the second hit the warehouse;
- Hezbollah bases in Quseir were not attacked;
- The border crossing Jusia was not attacked;
- There is no information about the victims.

 

Coalition planes (as claimed) striked SAA in Syrian Badia on 23.05. 2 SAA soldiers killed:

https://scontent.fhel6-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/33312446_2122576858020994_1003475574921887744_n.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=44d724a33ee2527913b81635a8f1f9e8&oe=5B7A2189

Quote

- 1st Lieutenant Matar Ali Sallum from Mahrusa in Homs.
- 1st Lieutenant Muhammad Ibrahim Abu Afif of Zakhra in Homs.

 

http://otvaga2004.mybb.ru/viewtopic.php?id=1934&p=25

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By LoooSeR
      Hello, my friends and Kharkovites, take a sit and be ready for your brains to start to work - we are going to tell you a terrible secret of how to tell apart Soviet tanks that actually works like GLORIOUS T-80 and The Mighty T-72 from Kharkovites attempt to make a tank - the T-64. Many of capitalists Westerners have hard time understanding what tank is in front of them, even when they know smart words like "Kontakt-5" ERA. Ignoramus westerners!
       
       
         Because you are all were raised in several hundreds years old capitalism system all of you are blind consumer dummies, that need big noisy labels and shiny colorful things to be attached to product X to be sold to your ignorant heads and wallets, thats why we will need to start with basics. BASICS, DA? First - how to identify to which tank "family" particular MBT belongs to - to T-64 tree, or T-72 line, or Superior T-80 development project, vehicles that don't have big APPLE logo on them for you to understand what is in front of you. And how you can do it in your home without access to your local commie tank nerd? 
       
       
         Easy! Use this Putin approved guide "How to tell appart different families of Soviet and Russian tanks from each other using simple and easy to spot external features in 4 steps: a guide for ignorant western journalists and chairborn generals to not suck in their in-depth discussions on the Internet".
       
       
       
      Chapter 1: Where to look, what to see.
       
      T-64 - The Ugly Kharkovite tank that doesn't work 
       
         We will begin with T-64, a Kharkovite attempt to make a tank, which was so successful that Ural started to work on their replacement for T-64 known as T-72. Forget about different models of T-64, let's see what is similar between all of them.
       
       
       

       
       
         
       
       
      T-72 - the Mighty weapon of Workers and Peasants to smash westerners
       
         Unlike tank look-alike, made by Kharkovites mad mans, T-72 is true combat tank to fight with forces of evil like radical moderate barbarians and westerners. Thats why we need to learn how identify it from T-64 and you should remember it's frightening lines!
       

       
       
       
      The GLORIOUS T-80 - a Weapon to Destroy and Conquer bourgeois countries and shatter westerners army
       
         And now we are looking at the Pride of Party and Soviet army, a true tank to spearhead attacks on decadent westerners, a tank that will destroy countries by sucking their military budgets and dispersing their armies in vortex of air, left from high-speed charge by the GLORIOUS T-80!

      The T-80 shooting down jets by hitting them behind the horizont 
          
    • By LoooSeR
      T-14 ARMATA 
      (edited)
              This thread is about glorious russian MBT T-14, known as "Armada", "T-95", "black eagle", "T-99" and other stupid Western names given to Object 148 (T-14 in some recent documents). Here is number of images connected to that vehicle.
       

      Official model of unknown "artillery vehicle". Yeah, Putin, we know that this is T-14. Note Gatling gun on turret right side.
       
      Artist impression of T-14 based on known model, by Fyodor Podporin. 
       

      T-14 will use Relikt ERA, which is considerable improvement over Kontakt-5 in resisting to tandem HEAT warheads and EFPs.

       
      Side skirts would be thicker on a real vehicle, i think. Relikt have AFAIK bigger size than Kontakt-5 ERA build-in blocks.

       
       
       
       
       
      Whole album with renders: 
      http://imgur.com/a/8Tn9b
       
      Video of same render from same artist:

       
       
            People expect that tank would have turret weapon system like what you see on the BMP-3 "Bakhcha-U" turret - a lot of weapons in one turret for one gunner to work with. T-14 is rumored to be equipped with 30 (or even 57) mm autocannon, 4-6 barrel gatling type MG/HMG, new 125 (2A82) or even 152 mm (2A83) smoothbore cannons. Turret is unmanned, crew of 3 would be located in frontal part of hull, behind very serious frontal armor inside of compartment, well protected from all directions. Cannon would be loaded by new autoloading device. I hope that Burevestnik is working on them, those guys managed to make 100 mm Naval gun with RoF of 300 shots per minute.
       
            I really like how turret looks, but i don't understand why there is such a big turret "busket" for unmanned turret with all ammo placed inside of hull in special armored housing. Also, i don't see gunner sight and proposed FSC radar on 3D model (i assume that panoramic sight is for commander). Laser sensors on 3D model are from T-90A variant of "Shtora".
       
            Some officials mentioned works on new active protection system, that consist of powerfull radar station, that can work on "long ranges" and engage incoming projectiles (missiles) with that gatling MG. Will this system survive development stage and be presented on serial tanks is unknown. Although turret for T-15 Armata-based IFV already was shown with new APS "Afganit".
       
            If you pay attention you may see that artist used T-80 rollers for Armata chassis, and this is not a mistake - according to some sources Armata heavy chassis will use T-80 or T-80-like rollers to save weight. And looking at rear part of that tank you may notice a engine deck from gas-turbine equipped version of the T-80, which can be mistake becuase MoD want Armata with new ~1500 HP diesel engine. 
    • By Tied
      Yes
       
      i personally support it, by finding the KGB Felix Dzerzhinsky greatly improved state scurrility both inside the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and abroad (their jurisdiction was only domestic, but they kept the internationally influential people safe at night)   a dedicated defender of both the Revolution and all the Soviet peoples     what do you think of this news?
×