Serge

FFG has handed its HiMoLap technology demonstrator to the BAAINBw (which had ordered it).
 


 
https://esut.de/2021/06/meldungen/27866/demonstrator-mobile-landplattform/

Some details of the evolution of the In-arm suspension unit for the Redback.
 

 
Some of the ride-height adjustments available:
 

 
The evolution over time:
 

 
The K21 cutaway:
 

 
The Redback evolution:
 

@Serge
 

I suppose you could bolt on a LAW in a hurry, but the RT40 according the manufacturer absolutely does not have provisions for ATGMs or hardkill APS. That is literally why they put RT60 to market, as it otherwise offers essentially nothing over RT40.

I found this :

New from Hanwha:
 
 

A new video about the Borsuk IFV :
 
 

A new video about the Borsuk IFV :
 
 

A new video about the Borsuk IFV :
 
 

Kongsberg MCT proturded quite a bit into the hull, maybe the new turret is less intrusive?
 

This bar armour is laser cut. 
It’s light. But it’s ugly too on the Jaguar. 

More likely cut on waterjet as laser would anneal the material on the cut and its also quite thick plate to cut .

Powerpacks weigh up to 5 or so tons, which I doubt that light crane can deal with, but conversely the 113 fitters can't deal with that either, so it's likely not a problem.
 
Replacing the 113 is always a good idea, even if it is by using an obsolete tank hull tortured almost beyond recognition.
 
Also, you aren't very subtle with your ban evading accounts, are you?

You are correct in assuming this is Mark 3 based. But this is not a cheap alternative to the Namer ARV. They fulfill very different tasks.
Simply, the Namer ARV replaces the M88, and the Pereg replaces M113 maintenance vehicles such as this one:

By the way this new variant is called Pereg. It is a Hebrew acronym for Generic Armored Platform for maintenance units.
It will be used by Company-level tech units to maintain tanks and other AFVs, reducing dependence on light crane vehicles like the Rio trucks or M113s.
Of course, there will be an overlap with the Namer ARV, because the ARV will use its massive crane to assist others in lifting light weights like powerpacks and armor blocks, which the Pereg can also easily do, and use its sheer size to carry spares but they still fill different niches.
Pereg is also said to have a MEDEVAC capability, a capability which I do not know whether the ARV has.
The superstructure itself seems to add quite a lot of room in the Ofek, and I assume here as well. Perhaps more than the Namer affords.
 
EDIT: Pereg may not necessarily be able to lift a powerpack, and light crane vehicles' ability is in doubt.

https://www.facebook.com/Technology.IDF/posts/3041064092794002

The Arjun MBT program started in 1972. 

The Jaguar is a specific design with very French inputs.
-1 : French cavalry considered video sighting is not mature enough. So, optical backup sight was asked for both the gunner and the tank commander. 
-2 : the DGA procurement agency introduced special requirements. The most noticeable one is the bubble like driver hatch. At the beginning, the driver hatch was supposed to be a Leclerc MBT one. But DGA asked a 10RC one. They think it’s safer when driving opened hatch. This choice is the worst because of its complexe impact on armor. 

Nah, they'll be in the FV432.

The Jaguar is a specific design with very French inputs.
-1 : French cavalry considered video sighting is not mature enough. So, optical backup sight was asked for both the gunner and the tank commander. 
-2 : the DGA procurement agency introduced special requirements. The most noticeable one is the bubble like driver hatch. At the beginning, the driver hatch was supposed to be a Leclerc MBT one. But DGA asked a 10RC one. They think it’s safer when driving opened hatch. This choice is the worst because of its complexe impact on armor. 

The Jaguar is a specific design with very French inputs.
-1 : French cavalry considered video sighting is not mature enough. So, optical backup sight was asked for both the gunner and the tank commander. 
-2 : the DGA procurement agency introduced special requirements. The most noticeable one is the bubble like driver hatch. At the beginning, the driver hatch was supposed to be a Leclerc MBT one. But DGA asked a 10RC one. They think it’s safer when driving opened hatch. This choice is the worst because of its complexe impact on armor. 

It’s not an MRAP drive line. 
Not the best available but not an MRAP one. 

OPFOR K21s vismodded with longer barrels
 

 
 

Pics of Jaguar stolen from twater