Jump to content
Sturgeon's House
Sturgeon

General AFV Thread

Recommended Posts

39F3700B00000578-3892754-image-a-12_1478

 

According to British tabloids/newspapers, the upper side boxes serve for storage of ammunition.

 

20140626_defencephotography_eurosatory_0

 

The lower boxes (not always fitted) also appear to serve for storage tasks (at least in some places).

 

ARES-loaded-onto-A400M-Atlas-mock-up-at-

 

Naked Scout-SV Ajax/Ares? (Note the arrangement of the headlights - that is not a standard ASCOD 2 hull).

 

Ares-acceptance-testing-Sept-2017.jpg

 

Note two things: the frontal hull armor is too thin to stop RPGs; on the right side is an Ares without modular armor at the sides and LFP: the armor modules appear to be usually mounted ontop of the storage boxes.

 

The ASCOD 2 tested in the Czech Republic also had all ammunition stored externally (outside the crew compartment) according to General Dynamics... and it looked like this:

DM1pL3UXcAEOKsQ.jpg

 

My guess is that the thick boxes mounted at the hull side are mostly storage boxes, which however needs to be armored (otherwise a bullet from a machine gun can set the most of the main gun ammo on fire).

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Ramlaen said:

Edit: So the idea is that the storage boxes are sandwiched between layers  of armor?

 

Yes, I believe that this would be the side armor arrangement.

 

1 hour ago, Willy Brandt said:

So how much ammo is ready in the vehicle and how much would be in the "side armor"?

 

You can see an early Ajax vehicle with storage boxes not covered by applique armor in the third video embedded in an article from Forces.tv.

 



syOXtIW.png2nyQ7p2.png

O5iZZZQ.png

By0ekEL.png

7uL3Un5.png

 

Here is the side armor without storage boxes/additional armor layers:

glLcWDn.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

2 hours ago, SH_MM said:

20140626_defencephotography_eurosatory_0

 

 

Yeah I remember now seeing this picture a while before. It doesn't make sense to use the entirety of the hull's size, on both sides, for storage. That's just a ridiculous amount of equipment they're carrying there. I definitely wouldn't want to be the guy that loses all his gear because some dude with an AK decided to have a little fun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, SH_MM said:

But I guess they now officially confirmed (for the second time), that the "side armor" modules are in fact storage boxes; otherwise there wouldn't be a need to adopt the net-based Tarian's RPG armour at the sides.

 

ajax-fig.jpg

 

The storage boxes are only on the very upper right side. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://otvaga2004.mybb.ru/viewtopic.php?id=984&p=24#p1024037

More photos of VT-4

zw7Pl.jpg

 

Claims that this is antena for Friend-or-foe system

7Iwyo.jpg

 

Spoiler

http://s4.uploads.ru/SdjcM.jpg

 

http://s5.uploads.ru/l8SOi.jpg

 

http://sa.uploads.ru/ZvwRt.jpg

 

Cooling fan

http://se.uploads.ru/R8FwI.jpg

 

Q0120107180114124619.jpg

 

Q0420107180114124619.jpg

 

Q0520107180114124619.jpg

 

Q0920107180114124620.jpg

 

Q01020107180114124620.jpg

 

AFAIK RCWS optics

A03178245180114124823.jpg

 

A05178245180114124824.jpg

 

A06178245180114124824.jpg

 

A08178245180114124824.jpg

 

A07178246180114125115.jpg

 

A09178246180114125115.jpg

 

VT4-Children-Day-at-2nd-Cavalry-Division-2018-16.jpg

 

VT4-Children-Day-at-2nd-Cavalry-Division-2018-18.jpg

 

VT4-Children-Day-at-2nd-Cavalry-Division-2018-10.jpg

https://www.facebook.com/sompong.nondhasa/posts/1152152848221158?pnref=story

http://www.thaifighterclub.org/webboard/20107/VT-4-Royat-Thai-Army.html

http://aagth1.blogspot.ru/2018/01/vt4-oplot-m60a3.html

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=1246567&page=128

 

27164839_1150647698371673_155937651573428950_o.jpg

 

Spoiler

27024114_1150647815038328_5835406658792276502_o.jpg

 

27164810_1150647798371663_6353866658603171337_o.jpg

 

27356462_1150647728371670_2955874053892618202_o.jpg

 

27023784_1150647651705011_8668611623498227164_o.jpg

 

27021685_1150647761705000_5747648656215322052_o.jpg

 

lol

26907653_10156065834779819_4714133665680230931_n.jpg

 

27164256_1152151211554655_7996079789842277672_o.jpg

 

00686Rb7ly1fnst7txfcfj31cw0u0jws.jpg

 

53ed1838ly1fntuovr3z1j21kw11y4qp.jpg

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

   As the Iraqi newspaper Al Ghad Press reported on January 28, 2018, the American General Dynamics corporation ceased the program of technical and service support of the M1A1M Abrams tank of the Iraqi army at its technical base at Al Matan airport in Baghdad from the end of 2017. This was in response to Iraq's revealed violations of the contractual agreement on the receipt of these tanks, expressed primarily in the transfer of at least two Abrams tanks from the Iraqi army to the pro-Iranian Shiite militia "Hashd al-Shaabi" ("People's Mobilization Force"). It is reported that General Dynamics has previously repeatedly informed the Iraqi government of the inadmissible from its point of view the transfer of Abrams tanks to armed groups that are not part of the Iraqi army.

Ambrams_Shia_Militia

https://bmpd.livejournal.com/3069267.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, EnsignExpendable said:

Any idea what this could be? The only Vickers light tank of the era I can think of is the Mk.VI, but why bother testing it in 1945?

 

 

The Harry Hopkins? 

 

Testing may have less to do with the current tank and more about learning how to improve future vehicle designs. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×