Jump to content
Sturgeon's House

General artillery, SPGs, MLRS and long range ATGMs thread.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Object 326 SPG (Unofficial name - "Shayba"), was an initiative development by DB. 46 rounds, "double stack" in circular autoloader, crew in hull compartment outside of "turret". The gun, ammunition ra

2S18 Pat-S, an experimental precursor to the 2S31.  Armament was a SA61 152mm howitzer.    

Some information about Bereg ("Coast") coastal defense system.    System consist of 3 vehicle types - SPGs, command post vehicle and "Combat duty support vehicle". On a photo above SPG is on

14 hours ago, Serge said:

Translation :


The U.S. Army is looking for a 155 mm self-propelled gun to replace the towed howitzers of the forces present in Europe. A Request for Proposal (RFP) was issued last July for evaluations conducted in early 2021 in the United States, a request to which Nexter will respond with versions 6×6 and 8×8 of its CAESAR.


Will CAESAR rewrite history by going to defeat BRUTUS on its own turf? Designed by the Americans AM General and Mandus Group, the latter hoped for a duel with the Archer system produced by the British group BAE Systems. This was without counting on the French troublemaker, which is about to begin negotiations with the US Army.

In issuing this RFP, the U.S. Army is considering the acquisition of a "more mobile, lethal and durable 155 mm system to replace its current fleet of towed howitzers." Lacking such capacity, the U.S. military wants to probe the market and gather the data needed to guide future needs issued by the Joint Program Executive Office Armaments and Ammunition (JPEO A-A).

The assessments will take place at the Yuma, Arizona test field, which includes an 89 km deep artillery firing range. Each selected candidate will be assigned a test window of approximately three months between January and May 2021. Several companies will be able to be selected for this initial phase, but only one will be awarded a production contract for a batch of 18 pieces for further experimentation. The first deliveries are expected, at best, in the first half of 2023.

These guns will primarily equip the Stryker Combat Brigades (SBCT). A combined force centered on the Stryker wheeled vehicle, an SBCT is designed to maximize the balance between mobility and firepower. Its fire support capability is based on an artillery battalion consisting of three six-piece M777A2 155 mm batteries. The limited range of this howitzer, as well as increased mobility requirements, contributed to the launch of a replacement program as early as February 2018.

Since 2016, the U.S. Army has been studying the introduction of an improved version of this howitzer that could double the maximum range. The resulting lengthening of the tube nevertheless affects the system's mobility in difficult terrain, leading to the emphasis on self-propelled artillery. Too heavy, too slow, a tracked tracker is excluded in favor of a wheeled vehicle, the most able to accompany as closely as possible the manoeuvring units in their progression. In the event of a generalization of the self-propelled gun to all TSCs, the initial target will evolve to typically "American" proportions. That is, several dozen copies, several years of workload for the selected industrialist and a potential springboard to other prestigious customers, the US Marine Corps in the lead.

The legacy of TF Lafayette and Wagram

Self-propelled guns on wheels, many armies want them, few have them and only one regularly deploys them in OPEX: the Army. Of the three candidates currently in the running, CAESAR is the only one that can claim to be "fight come" for more than a decade. It was through joint operations that he was able to demonstrate his capabilities to the U.S. military.

In Afghanistan, first, where the artillery of GTIA Surobi and Kapisa of TF Lafayette will have been regularly used by American troops. Then in Iraq, where the French gunners of the TF Wagram carried out more than 2500 fire missions between 2016 and 2019 alongside their American counterparts. Two different operational environments, but in which caesar's agility and firepower will have made a strong impression on foreign partners. With a corolaire that, on the American side, holds in five words: "We want it too." It is also this SOUTEX "in contact" with the Army that will weigh in the balance when the JPEO A and A has to decide.

Apart from its operational results, CAESAR is the only one to tick virtually all commercial and technical boxes. Heavier and more complex due to the automatic loading system, the Archer is also much more expensive and has so far only been adopted by Sweden. The first of 48 systems ordered did not enter service in the Swedish Army until 2016. The Archer's main advantage ultimately is the ability to take advantage of the strike force of the powerful U.S. subsidiary of BAE Systems, a long-time supplier to the U.S. Army.

When the Archer is still looking for a first export customer, the CAESAR is a proven commercial success with more than 300 copies sold worldwide. And this customer book has expanded further this year with the 36 pieces acquired by Morocco and the contract negotiations underway with the Czech Republic for the delivery of 52 copies. As required in the RFP, the French gun is fully compatible with the BONUS and Excalibur guided munitions of the American portfolio, the first being the product of a co-development between Nexter Munitions and Bofors (BAE Systems).

As for the BRUTUS, it is certainly the only one to be a 100% American product and has already been evaluated by the US Army. But if it plays the card of simplicity by relying on the combination of an FMTV 6×6 truck and a tube identical to that of the M777A2, its development is not yet complete. The use of this 155/39 caliber gun still limits its range to 22 km with standard ammunition, compared to up to 38 km for Caesar. The FMTV does not include crew protection, loading system, or built-in ammunition locker, when CAESAR carries 18 fire-ready rounds for version 6×6 and 30 for chassis 8×8. The BRUTUS must therefore be accompanied permanently by a second FMTV to transport the five to seven gunners needed for its implementation and to supply it with shells. With the consequences of battery life, mobility and battery time. The U.S. Army will potentially have to choose between protectionism that means less capacity and pragmatism that is more conducive to a foreign solution. Start of response, if Nexter is selected and the schedule met, in about six months.

Copyright © 2011-2020 FOB - Forces Operations Blog - All Rights Reserved. »
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Beer said:

Do you know if Nexter would offer the system on its usual chassis or it would addopt it to some specific American ones? 

Given that it already exist on Renault Sherpa, Mercedes Unimog and Tatra 815 chassis, I guess there would be no problem to mount it on an American built one.

Just have to make sure that it won't break when the gun is fired (or after extensive use).

Link to post
Share on other sites

   TOS-1 and -1A will receive new rockets with 15 km max range + new digital network equipment.



   Sources in the military department told Izvestia that a fundamental decision to modernize TOS-1 and TOS-1A has already been made. Newly released vehicles will receive updates first. And the systems already delivered to the troops will be upgraded during the repair process. Improving the characteristics of the technique was required due to the growing range and changes in tasks for heavy flamethrower systems, the interlocutors explained. In addition to modern digital means of communication, TOS will also receive equipment for a closed data transmission segment, known as the "military Internet". This will make it possible to integrate the vehicles not only into reconnaissance and fire circuits, but also into the most modern automated control systems of the tactical level. Subsequently, it is planned to adapt for them the latest long-range ammunition, used so far only by TOS-2 "Tosochka".


   Now the troops of radiation, chemical and biological protection (RHBZ) units are armed with up to a hundred heavy flamethrower systems of two modifications: TOS-1 "Buratino" based on the T-72 tank and the improved TOS-1A "Solntsepek" on the T-90 chassis. All these vehicles will be improved. According to the military department, earlier in the exercises "Center-2019" they already tested a new organizational and staff structure for the massive use of "Solntsepek". And on strategic maneuvers "Kavkaz-2020" TOS-2 used long-range missiles TBS-4M with thermobaric warhead. The range of the first Buratino weapons was only 3.5 km. Subsequently, it was brought to 6 km. New ammunition, tested in exercises in 2020, will increase the reach at once by two and a half times, up to 15 km. Izvestia reported on the development of these missiles back in 2016. Also, according to Izvestia, all tracked TOS of the Southern Military District will be replaced by wheeled Tosochka by 2025. But in other regions of the country, "Buratino" and "Solntsepeki" will be in service with units and subdivisions of the RKhBZ for a long time.

   Probably at cost of something else - maybe less ammunition will be carried thanks to increased weight of launcher unit (longer range rockets looks like require longer launch tubes, as Tosochka shown).

Link to post
Share on other sites

More details about the Ukrainean Dana M2 deal.



In short:

- the contract was signed in 2018 and originally was for 66 units however it was reduced to 26 (possibly for financial reasons)

- the contract contains 5000 HE-Frag and 1000 long range DN1CZ rounds

- the price of the contract is 40 million USD


The article discusses the controversy going around it especially due to the fact that the SPH uses the same old 152 mm old gun as the original vz.77 Dana, i.e. it's limited to maximum 25,5 km range, however it names a lot of reasons why it is still reasonably good deal for Ukraine. 

- Ukraine doesn't produce 155 mm ammo (Artem company went bankrupt with large debts) and Dana can fire Soviet 152 mm ammo

- Ukraine probably isn't able to buy guided ammo and without it the fire on longer distances than 25 km makes little sense due to an enormous ammo quantity needed for guaranteed destruction of the target

- Dana still outranges most of the other artillery guns around such as the most common 2S1, 2S3, D-20 and D-30  

- The vehicle has number of advantages, namely fully automated operation with 36 ready-to-fire rounds, large ammo capacity (36+24), crew under armor during fire, high tactical mobility, modern FCS with automatic setting of action position, short time to deploy and to leave (90/60 seconds), higher rate of fire than most of the other guns around (5 RPM initial, 4 RPM sustained), high reliability and lower cost

- The article states that Dana M2 is able to deploy, fire accurately 6 rounds and leave in 220 seconds and repeat this cycle six times by using only ammo stored in the automatic magazine which makes it rather safe from counter-battery fire 

- They also mention that Azeri Dana M1 were successfully used in Nagorno Karabakh on the souther front where they were heavily engaged in battles of Handrut, Schushi and Lachin corridor including repelling Armenian counter offensive on 7-9. October 

- Last but not least the article states that from the EU and Western countries only Czech and Slovak companies are willing/allowed to sell heavy weapons to Ukraine 


At the end it's mentioned that Ukraine is indeed going to use Tatra chassis in the future. For now it's confirmed for Neptum AShM and Bureviy heavy MLRS. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

   The Central Scientific Research Institute of Precision Engineering (TsNIITOCHMASH) of the State Corporation Rostec has completed acceptance tests of the 120-mm self-propelled artillery gun "Lotos" (index 2S42). The combat vehicle for the airborne troops has confirmed compliance with the specified tactical and technical characteristics.

   The test program, which includes 57 points, made it possible to assess the performance of all units, mechanisms and instruments of the weapon. During the tests "Lotus" covered 400 km and fired 14 shots.

   The military representation in TsNIITOCHMASH signed an official document on the compliance of the SPG prototype with working design documentation and readiness for preliminary tests.

   "Lotos" has a mass of no more than 18 tons, maximum speed - 70 km / h, engine power - 450 hp, cruising range - not less than 500 km. The combat crew consists of four people. The firing range is up to 13 km. The CAO was created on a chassis unified in units and assemblies with the BMD-4M, equipped with a fighting compartment with a 120-mm gun with a high degree of automation of preparation and firing operations.

   Initial factory tests done, will be transfered to MoD for trials.



Link to post
Share on other sites

   Posting news about this ATGM here, as it is for vehicles only, even if it size is more fit for infantry-carried ATGM.



   Serial production of the newest Bulat missile will begin in 2022


   Serial production of the newest Bulat guided missile is scheduled for 2022. This was announced on Friday, November 27, by the industrial director of the armaments complex of the state corporation "Rostec" Bekkhan Ozdoev.


   “We are making an experimental batch of Bulats for preliminary tests as part of a combat vehicle. Given that the completion of development work is generally planned at the end of 2021, the serial production of these guided missiles is planned to begin in 2022, "RIA Novosti reports.

   According to Ozdoev, flight tests of the missile, designed to destroy lightly armored vehicles, were completed with a positive result in September, and its stable flight at the maximum range in the entire operating temperature range was confirmed. "Bulat" is planned to be used in addition to anti-tank guided missiles "Kornet", reported in the holding "High-Precision Complexes", an enterprise - the developer of weapons (part of "Rostec").


    The beginning of flight tests of "Bulat" was reported in August. The missile is capable of hitting targets at a distance of at least 3 km - both lightly armored enemy vehicles and low-flying targets - drones and helicopters. Small-sized guided "Bulats" will add additional firepower to the "Kornets" and will occupy a niche between the anti-tank guided missile and the main gun of a combat vehicle, experts explained.

   This also gives kind of inderect reference to timeline of Epokha turret production.



Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Stimpy75 said:

new chinese SPH, not much info


  Hide contents












   Yeah, at first glance it looks like PLZ-05, but looking closer differences are visible. 7 rollers per side instead of 6, different shape of turret, new MZ radar assembly on gun. Cannon externally looks exactly same as it was on PLZ-05.

   IMO new version/modernised "PLZ-05". Changes (at least externally) are not big.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

    • By Beer
      I haven't found an appropriate thread where to put some interesting rare stuff related to WW2 development, be it industrial one or makeshift field modifications. 
      Let's start with two things. The first one is a relatively recently found rarity from Swedish archives - a drawing of ČKD/BMM V8H-Sv tank. The drawing and a letter was found by WoT enthusiasts in Swedish archives in 2014 (the original announcement and the drawing source is here). The drawing is from a message dated 8th September 1941. One of the reasons why this drawing was not known before may be that the Czech archives were partially destroyed by floods in 2002. Anyway it is an export modification of the V-8-H tank accepted into Czechoslovak service as ST vz.39 but never produced due to the cancelation of all orders after Münich 1938 (for the same reason negotiations about licence production in Britain failed). Also later attempt to sell the tank to Romania failed due to BMM being fully busy with Wehrmacht priority orders. The negotiations with Sweden about licence production of V8H-Sv lasted till 1942, at least in May 1942 Swedish commission was present in Prague for negotiations. The tank differed compared to the base ST vz.39 in thicker armor with different front hull shape (armor 60 mm @ 30° on the hull front and also 60 mm on the turret; all sides were 40 mm thick). The tank was heavier (20 tons) and had the LT vz.38 style suspension with probably even larger wheels. The engine was still the same Praga NR V8 (240-250 Hp per source). The armament was unchanged with 47 mm Škoda A11 gun and two vz.37 HMG. The commander's cupola was of the simple small rotating type similar to those used on AH-IV-Sv tankettes. It is known that the Swedes officially asked to arm the tank with 75 mm gun, replace the engine with Volvo V12 and adding third HMG to the back of the turret. In the end the Swedes decided to prefer their own Strv/m42. 

      Source of the drawing
      The second is makeshift field modification found on Balkans. It appears Ustasha forces (and possibly some SS anti-partizan units) used several Italian M15/42 medium tanks with turrets from Pz.38(t). There are several photos of such hybrids but little more is known. On one photo it is possible to see Ustasha registration number U.O. 139.

      Few more photos of such hybrid.
      It appears that the source of all those photos to be found on the internet is this book, Armoured units of the Axis forces in southeastern Europe in WW2 by Dinko Predoevic. 
    • By LoooSeR
      Hello, my friends and Kharkovites, take a sit and be ready for your brains to start to work - we are going to tell you a terrible secret of how to tell apart Soviet tanks that actually works like GLORIOUS T-80 and The Mighty T-72 from Kharkovites attempt to make a tank - the T-64. Many of capitalists Westerners have hard time understanding what tank is in front of them, even when they know smart words like "Kontakt-5" ERA. Ignoramus westerners!
         Because you are all were raised in several hundreds years old capitalism system all of you are blind consumer dummies, that need big noisy labels and shiny colorful things to be attached to product X to be sold to your ignorant heads and wallets, thats why we will need to start with basics. BASICS, DA? First - how to identify to which tank "family" particular MBT belongs to - to T-64 tree, or T-72 line, or Superior T-80 development project, vehicles that don't have big APPLE logo on them for you to understand what is in front of you. And how you can do it in your home without access to your local commie tank nerd? 
         Easy! Use this Putin approved guide "How to tell appart different families of Soviet and Russian tanks from each other using simple and easy to spot external features in 4 steps: a guide for ignorant western journalists and chairborn generals to not suck in their in-depth discussions on the Internet".
      Chapter 1: Where to look, what to see.
      T-64 - The Ugly Kharkovite tank that doesn't work 
         We will begin with T-64, a Kharkovite attempt to make a tank, which was so successful that Ural started to work on their replacement for T-64 known as T-72. Forget about different models of T-64, let's see what is similar between all of them.

      T-72 - the Mighty weapon of Workers and Peasants to smash westerners
         Unlike tank look-alike, made by Kharkovites mad mans, T-72 is true combat tank to fight with forces of evil like radical moderate barbarians and westerners. Thats why we need to learn how identify it from T-64 and you should remember it's frightening lines!

      The GLORIOUS T-80 - a Weapon to Destroy and Conquer bourgeois countries and shatter westerners army
         And now we are looking at the Pride of Party and Soviet army, a true tank to spearhead attacks on decadent westerners, a tank that will destroy countries by sucking their military budgets and dispersing their armies in vortex of air, left from high-speed charge by the GLORIOUS T-80!

      The T-80 shooting down jets by hitting them behind the horizont 
    • By LoooSeR
      T-14 ARMATA 
              This thread is about glorious russian MBT T-14, known as "Armada", "T-95", "black eagle", "T-99" and other stupid Western names given to Object 148 (T-14 in some recent documents). Here is number of images connected to that vehicle.

      Official model of unknown "artillery vehicle". Yeah, Putin, we know that this is T-14. Note Gatling gun on turret right side.
      Artist impression of T-14 based on known model, by Fyodor Podporin. 

      T-14 will use Relikt ERA, which is considerable improvement over Kontakt-5 in resisting to tandem HEAT warheads and EFPs.

      Side skirts would be thicker on a real vehicle, i think. Relikt have AFAIK bigger size than Kontakt-5 ERA build-in blocks.

      Whole album with renders: 
      Video of same render from same artist:

            People expect that tank would have turret weapon system like what you see on the BMP-3 "Bakhcha-U" turret - a lot of weapons in one turret for one gunner to work with. T-14 is rumored to be equipped with 30 (or even 57) mm autocannon, 4-6 barrel gatling type MG/HMG, new 125 (2A82) or even 152 mm (2A83) smoothbore cannons. Turret is unmanned, crew of 3 would be located in frontal part of hull, behind very serious frontal armor inside of compartment, well protected from all directions. Cannon would be loaded by new autoloading device. I hope that Burevestnik is working on them, those guys managed to make 100 mm Naval gun with RoF of 300 shots per minute.
            I really like how turret looks, but i don't understand why there is such a big turret "busket" for unmanned turret with all ammo placed inside of hull in special armored housing. Also, i don't see gunner sight and proposed FSC radar on 3D model (i assume that panoramic sight is for commander). Laser sensors on 3D model are from T-90A variant of "Shtora".
            Some officials mentioned works on new active protection system, that consist of powerfull radar station, that can work on "long ranges" and engage incoming projectiles (missiles) with that gatling MG. Will this system survive development stage and be presented on serial tanks is unknown. Although turret for T-15 Armata-based IFV already was shown with new APS "Afganit".
            If you pay attention you may see that artist used T-80 rollers for Armata chassis, and this is not a mistake - according to some sources Armata heavy chassis will use T-80 or T-80-like rollers to save weight. And looking at rear part of that tank you may notice a engine deck from gas-turbine equipped version of the T-80, which can be mistake becuase MoD want Armata with new ~1500 HP diesel engine. 
    • By CrashbotUS
      I'm doing some research on cold war era Soviet artillery doctrine and was wondering if anyone had any actual Soviet resources. No need for translations, I can read Russian. 
      Right now I have the FM 100-2.1 The Soviet Army:Operations and Tactics from my Army days and some NATO books that really only talk about what we knew from "observational reports". 
      I also have some Soviet artillery survivabilty manuals and Soviet artillery order of battle data but I'm have some trouble with actual artillery unit manuals and the like. 
      Anyone have a good source? 

  • Create New...